Editorial

Abstract

Dear readers,

The replacement of fetal bovine serum (FBS) in cell culture use is gaining traction. As with the acceptance of alternative methods in general, pity for the animals involved (here the unborn calves) and the development of the necessary tools (here human serum and deri­vates thereof used as medium supplements, or chemically defined media), have not been sufficient to achieve wide-spread change. But now, new technologies are creating a greater demand for FBS-free media, i.e., technologies aiming at growing tissues that can be trans­planted to humans, OECD has accepted an FBS-free variation of a guideline test, and the arguments for change are focusing more on the benefits of being able to more closely model human physiology and thus better predict human responses.

The Food for Thought ... contribution in this issue shows that alternatives to FBS have gained the attention of the OECD. In a thought-starter ahead of an expert meeting on the subject, Miriam Jacobs and colleagues explore questions surrounding the use of human serum and derived products, such as who and where are the suppliers, what regulations do the products underly in dif­ferent countries, how can it be assured that a larger scale demand for such products does not compete with the need for human blood products for transfusion purposes, what safety measures are re­quired to protect laboratory workers, and are there cultural aspects that may affect use?

Also on the subject of FBS alternatives, Miriam Pons and col­leagues demonstrate the practical application of human platelet ly­sate derived from outdated platelet concentrates by directly compar­ing the growth of and sensitivity to chemotherapeutics of different cancer cells grown in medium supplemented with either FBS or human platelet lysate. They show that all parameters measured are the same in both media, further supporting that switching to such a xenofree supplement is feasible.

A review by Elena Dellambra et al. provides an overview of mod­els of the human skin, including currently used animal models and the limitations they have owing to the differences between human and animal skin, the different variants of in vitro skin models that have been developed, as well as in silico models and in vitro models of human skin diseases.

A model using human skin cells to test the antioxidative ca­pacity of chemical UV filters used in sunscreens is described by Stefanie Hofer and colleagues. They found that although some UV filter substances protected the cells from UV damage, others instead displayed undesirable pro-oxidative properties, which should be further investigated.

Seafood for human consumption must be free of marine biotox­ins, which are produced by algae under certain conditions. Although the animal test has now been mostly replaced by chemical-analyt­ical methods that detect the presence of the toxins, these tests can only detect known structures, not new variants. Marcia Bodero et al. propose a tiered testing strategy that includes measuring the expres­sion of selected genes in a human cell line that point to the presence of a marine biotoxin signature to investigate samples that are posi­tive in a previous in vitro screening assay but cannot be confirmed by chemical-analytical assessment.

Most food comes into direct contact with packaging materials, from which components may transfer to the food items and be consumed. Melissa Van Bossuyt et al. asked how much we know about whether printed paper and board materials used for this pur­pose can cause cancer. As they found little clear evidence either way for most of the relevant substances, they combined the exist­ing data with computer-aided predictions and results of an in vitro test to prioritize the substances of further testing. This strategy could also be useful for other applications, as it aims to both in­crease human safety and reduce the number of substances tested in animals.

The zebrafish embryotoxicity test (ZET) was used to assess the potential effects of petroleum substances on prenatal development by Lenny Kamelia and colleagues. This test is considered an alter­native assay as it uses early stage fish embryos that have not yet developed a functional nervous system and are thus unable to ex­perience pain. Although the results produced by this test for this class of compound did not correspond as well with existing in vivo data as results produced with a different in vitro assay, the authors conclude that testing substances in a battery of in vitro assays in­cluding the ZET is preferable to relying on a single in vitro assay for this complex endpoint.

In developing and validating a new in vitro test, the availability of reference chemicals, for which there is clear evidence that they either do or do not have the property of interest, is essential so as to demonstrate that the test specifically detects the desired proper­ty. Judson et al. present a semi-automated process to develop ref­erence chemical lists for in vitro tests by extracting information from public data sources.

Industry has become a major driving force in the field of al­ternatives to animal experiments, in some cases owing to outside forces, e.g., the ban on animal testing for cosmetics ingredients, but often also because of its drive to take up innovative technolo­gy and to make processes more efficient. Mario Beilmann intro­duces the Investigative Toxicology Leaders Forum, a group of Eu­ropean-based leaders from different pharmaceutical companies, who have joined forces to improve the precision of safety deci­sions early on in the drug development process by adopting new, human-relevant technologies that investigate the underlying tox­icity mechanisms. Together, they hope to improve the accuracy of predicting which potential new drug will have a low risk of tox­icity in humans.

In their letter, Katy Taylor and Laura Rego Alvarez report on animal use in European countries during 2016 compared to 2014, both with regard to the quality of each country’s reporting and the changes in animal use. Four meeting reports and the Corners update you on recent activities in the field. Please note that the EUSAAT Congress has been moved to October 10-13, 2019.

Best wishes,

Sonja von Aulock
Editor in chief, ALTEX