A standardized method based on pigmented epidermal models evaluates sensitivity against UV-irradiation

Main Article Content

Freia F. Schmid, Florian Groeber-Becker , Stefanie Schwab, Sibylle Thude, Matthias Goebeler, Heike Walles, Jan Hansmann
[show affiliations]

Abstract

To protect the human skin from extensive solar radiation, melanocytes produce melanin and disperse it via mela­nosomes to keratinocytes in the basal and suprabasal layers of the human epidermis. Moreover, melanocytes are associated with pathological skin conditions such as vitiligo and psoriasis. Thus, an in vitro skin model that comprises a defined cutaneous pigmentation system is highly relevant in cosmetic, pharmaceutical and medical research. Here, we describe how the epidermal melanin unit can be established in vitro. Primary human melanocytes were introduced into an open source reconstructed epidermis. Following 14 days at the air liquid interface, a differentiated epidermis had formed and the melanocytes were located in the basal layer. The functionality of the epidermal melanin unit could be shown by the transfer of melanin to the surrounding keratinocytes, and a significantly increased melanin content of models stimulated with either UV-radiation or the melanin precursor dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA). An UV50 assay was developed to test the protective effect of melanin. In analogy to the IC50 value in risk assessment, the UV50 value facilitates a quantitative investigation of harmful effects of natural UV-radiation to the skin in vitro. Employing this test, we could demonstrate that the melanin content correlates with the resilience against simulated sunlight, which comprises 2.5% UVB and 97.5% UVA. Besides demonstrating the protective effect of melanin in vitro, the assay was used to determine the protective effect of a consumer product in a highly standardized setup.

Article Details

How to Cite
Schmid, F. F. (2018) “A standardized method based on pigmented epidermal models evaluates sensitivity against UV-irradiation”, ALTEX - Alternatives to animal experimentation, 35(3), pp. 390–396. doi: 10.14573/altex.1712211.
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)