Russell and Burch’s 3Rs then and now: The case of Switzerland
Main Article Content
Abstract
Since Russell and Burch introduced and defined the 3Rs, i.e., the replacement, reduction, and refinement of animal use in research, in 1959, different definitions have emerged and been implemented in guidelines and policies. Switzerland is known for having some of the most restrictive legislation regarding the use of animals, in which the 3Rs are also defined and implemented. To our knowledge, the purpose and definitions of the 3Rs used in the Swiss Animal Welfare Act, Animal Protection Ordinance, and Animal Experimentation Ordinance have never been compared with Russell and Burch’s original purpose and definitions. In this paper we make this comparison with two aims: to reveal ethically relevant departures from the original purpose and definitions, and to provide an ethical evaluation of the current Swiss law regarding the 3Rs. In doing so, we first expose the similarity of purposes. We then identify one risky departure from the original definition of replacement in Swiss law, which shows a problematic focus on species. Finally, we address Swiss law’s failure to apply the 3Rs in the most effective way. With respect to this last point, we discuss the need for 3R conflict resolution, the timing of application of the 3Rs, problematic prioritizations and choices of convenience as well as a solution to apply the 3Rs more effectively using Russell and Burch’s concept of total sum of distress.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is appropriately cited (CC-BY). Copyright on any article in ALTEX is retained by the author(s).
Beauchamp, T. L. and DeGrazia, D. (2020). Principles of Animal Research Ethics. Oxford University Press.
Button, K. S., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Mokrysz, C. et al. (2013). Power failure: Why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci 14, 365-376. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3475
De Boo, M. J., Rennie, A. E., Buchanan-Smith, H. M. et al. (2005). The interplay between replacement, reduction and refinement: Considerations where the Three Rs interact. Animal Welfare 14, 327-332. doi:10.1017/S0962728600029651
EU – European Union (2010). Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. OJL 276, 33-79. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/lexuriserv/lexuriserv.do?uri=oj:l:2010:276:0033:0079:en:pdf
Fenwick, N., Danielson, P. and Griffin, G. (2011). Survey of Canadian animal-based researchers’ views on the Three Rs: Replacement, reduction and refinement. PLoS One 6, e22478. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022478
Fenwick, N. and Griffin, G. (2013). Balancing reduction and refinement. Altern Lab Anim 41, 33-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/026119291304100311
FSVO – Federal Food Safety and Veterinary Office (2010). AEO – Animal experimentation ordinance. 455.163. https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2010/207/en (accessed 16.01.2023)
FSVO (2017a). Dignity of the animal: Guide to the ‘weighing of interests’. https://bit.ly/481oxah (accessed 08.05.2023).
FSVO (2017b). Dignity of the animal explanatory notes on the ‘weighing of interests’. https://bit.ly/3z7u2f9 (accessed 08.05.2023)
Russell, W. M. S. and Burch, R. L. (1959). The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique. Methuen & Co. Ltd: London, UK.
Segner, H. (2012). Fish. Nociception and Pain. A Biological Perspective (Vol. 9). Federal Office for Buildings and Logistics (FOBL). https://www.ekah.admin.ch/inhalte/ekah-dateien/dokumentation/publikationen/ekah_band_9_fish__englisch__v2_gza.pdf (accessed 09.02.2023)
Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences (2017). Weighing of interests for proposed animal experiments. Guidance for applicants. Swiss Academies Communications 12. https://bit.ly/47zsdjc (accessed 15.05.2023)
Swiss Confederation (2022). AniWA – Animal Welfare Act (2022). 455. https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2008/414/en (accessed 31.01.2023)
Swiss Federal Council (2022). AniPO – Ordinance on animal protection. 455.1. https://bit.ly/44E6jO9 (accessed 31.01.2023)
Tannenbaum, J. and Bennett, T. (2015). Russell and Burch’s 3Rs then and now: The need for clarity in definition and purpose. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 54, 120-132.
Wild, M. (2012). Fische: Kognition, Bewusstsein und Schmerz; eine philosophische Perspektive. Bundesamt für Bauten und Logistik BBL [Article in German]. https://paktev.de/mediapool/107/1071834/data/pdf_s/ekah_band_10_fische_inhalt_v2_web.pdf (accessed 09.02.2023)